This note copies material from a fairly
suspect site -- I imagine. I don't have time to check it out thoroughly now.
But consider the 15 numbered questions on their own merits.
Yikes, this is down-the-rabbit-hole stuff. But the key thing is, why does
the noise of Berg's scream start several seconds before the knife is applied,
with no visible action on his part issuing that scream? Also key is the assertion
that had Berg not been bled dry -- in effect, almost dead at time of his
decapitation -- there would have been blood spurting everywhere. Are the
terrorists so fastidious?
See the fifteen numbered questions below....
Al Qaeda has shown a somewhat deft hand at the timing of its communiques
-- the obvious question (see Howard Kurtz's column earlier this week) is
why they would shoot themselves in the foot by taking the prisoner abuse
story off the front pages?
Then there's all the squirrely stuff about the timing of Berg's release from
"Iraqi" custody, etc. And where the hell does his orange jump suit come from?
Since it calls so much attention to him, wouldn't Berg have sought to discard
it immediately upon being released from custody prior to being picked up
by whoever killed him?
And yes, the site below has a lot of screwed-up material -- I'm assuming.
(I don't have time to plumb its depths.) That doesn't mean some of the questions
aren't valid. See the 15 numbered questions below. Having watched the video,
a lot of them demand explanation.
Fishy Circumstances and Flawed Timelines
Surround American's Beheading
Infowars.com
05-12-04
Beheading video anomalies addressed
http://www.infowars.com/print/iraq/berg.html
UPDATE 12:45PM Central: This just in -- U.S. spokesman says decapitated American
was never held by U.S. forces
With several news outlets reporting that Berg's family is angry from the
US government over their son's violent death and revelations that "Berg was
detained by Iraqi police at a checkpoint in Mosul on March 24. He was turned
over to U.S. officials and detained for 13 days" (in other words, he was
detained by the US military just prior to his death) -- (AP 5/11/04) we have
to question what really happened and who was really behind Berg's horrific
murder.
We have received several emails from listeners questioning what really happened
including this one:
"If you look at the men dressed in black,
they all seem well fed. Actually most look fat. That bothers me, because
these guys are fighting a war and eating on the run. They are constantly
on the move and should be either very fit and trim or scrawny and malnourished
because of the same reasons. One thing they should not be is fat like couch
potatoes. If you look at all of the photos of the prisoners who were naked
who supposedly were just plucked of the street, most of them are thin. Just
an observation." Alex
And this one:
1) extremely convenient "wag the dog" timing at the height of furor
regarding U.S. torture of Iraqis
2) CNN poll question: "Is the Berg killing a reason for withholding
any
remaining Iraq prisoner abuse pictures?" Bush has been reported to
be
struggling with question of whether Pentagon should release additional
torture photos. Given that the alleged decapitation of Berg was allegedly
prompted by the first wave of torture photos, Bush could now cite "national
security" issues for witholding additional materials.
3) Berg's last known whereabouts was in U.S. custody.
4) Berg shown in video wearing orange jumpsuit known to be of U.S. issue
(compare with pictures at Guantanamo).
5) Berg mysteriously captured by Al-Quaeda (still wearing jumpsuit).
Either
he escaped from U.S. captors or U.S. let him out -- with orange suit and
all -- to be immediately apprehended by Al-Quaeda (before he had a chance
to
change).
6) Tape obviously spliced together and heavily edited. Goes from a)
Berg
sitting in chair talking about family, to b) Berg sitting on floor with
hooded "militants" behind, to c) blurry camera movement, to d) almost
motionless Berg on floor as head cut off.
7) Audio clearly dubbed in.
8) "Arab" reader flips through pages of "statement" and keeps ending up on
the same page. Perhaps doesn't even known enough Arabic to recognize
what
page he's on?
9) "Arabs" have lily-white hands and (other exposed) skin.
10) "Arabs" have Western-style body posture and mannerisms.
11) When Berg decapitated, there was almost no blood. If Berg were
still
alive at this point, with the cut starting at front of throat, blood would
have been spraying everywhere. Berg's severed head, the floor, Berg's
clothes, and even the hand of the "Arab" who decapitated Berg had no visible
blood on it.
12) Berg's body didn't move while on the ground. Although held down,
Berg
would have tried to instinctively wiggle and writhe away from captor's grip.
13) Camera angle made it impossible to see if Berg's eyes were even open.
14) Alleged "scream" from Berg sounded to be that of a woman and was clearly
dubbed in.
15) Berg goes to great trouble to identify himself, providing information
about his family. Why? To elicit greater sympathy? Or to
provide a
positive ID. FBI visited Berg family in an attempt to "verify his
identity". Guy in video looks very little like Berg photos provided
by
family.
HYPERLINKS
TO BE ADDED
Jeff Rense has compiled some important information on Berg's detainment and
questioning what really happened in his article, " Why Did The US Take Custody
Of Nick Berg?"
Two things are for sure:
First, Berg parents feel that their son was abandoned and betrayed by the
US Government.
Second: NeoCons have already started to use Nick Berg's murder to justify
torture and more war
Related Articles:
Why Did The US Take Custody Of Nick Berg?
Berg Time Line
Nick Berg was on his way out of Iraq. He had been released from the prison
where he had been held for 13 days by Iraqi police for reasons he said he
did not know.
Nick Berg's Parents Say US Abandoned Him
Pa. family angry with American government over son's brutal death
Qaeda Leader Beheads U.S. Civilian in Iraq
Awful images change perception of the war
NeoCons use Nick Berg's murder to justify torture and more war
|