May 29, 2000

On August 4 1997, Governor Christy Whitman signed a new crime bill into law, which greatly increased the punishment for possesion of marijuana. Making it a first degree crime like rape, murder, kidnapping. Punishable by 20 years in prison (POW-Camp) and a 300,00O fine. ( Violation of the eight amendment) On Nov. 24th, 1997 I was singled out to be first individual arrested under this new law. As the founder of the South Jersey Cannabis Buyer's Club. I was also charged with conspiracy which also carries it's own 10 year punishment. I immediatedly plead not guilty, based on the fact that the law is wrong not I. I demanded a jury trial as is my right. "30 years for "marijuana" ! - I don't think a fully informed jury would condone that!

Camden County Prosecutor investigator Mark Nickalous read me my Miranda rights, which included this statement - " Anything you say or do can and will be used against you at time of trial", I knew this also meant "or for you". This is why I ran for Congress, State Assembly and Camden County Freeholder board twice, to give myself plenty of opportunities to make public statements. I'm also running for congress again now. I knew a jury had the constitutional function and power of a jury to Judge a law as well as evidence. (1972 D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals -473 F. 2d 1113) Knowing this I spent the last two years  gearing my defense to presenting a case that the law is wrong. Not I. In opinion poll, after opinion poll citizens across the country know the truth about marijuana and say " Marijuana should be legal !". 

      "Jury nullification of law," as it is sometimes called, is a traditional American right defended by the Founding Fathers. Those Patriots intended  the jury to serve as one of the tests a law must pass before it assumes enough popular authority to be enforced. Thus the Constitution provides five separate tribunals with veto power - representatives, senate, executive, judges and JURY - that each enactment of law must pass before it gains the authority to punish those who choose to violate it. Thomas Jefferson said, "I consider trial by jury as the only anchor yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution." 

I have never complied with the assine marijuana laws, I've been a open medical marijuana user for close to twenty years. (1) First this is my body and only I and I alone have the right to regulate it. I freely choose to put marijuana into it. I utilize my ninth amendment right to regulate my own body, by self medicating with marijuana. (2) The governments claim that marijuana is dangerous is a pure lie! - The only thing dangerous about marijuana is the government's response to your defying it's prohibition. It imprision's you and ruins you like no amout of marijuana ever-could. (3) The government has mis-classified marijuana as a schedule 1 drug.  The government placed marijuana in the same schedule as cocaine, herion, and meth.. Schedule I drugs are illegal. - The Controled Substance's Act of 1969's legal definition of a schedule 1 drug is; the substance has to have no medical value in the U.S.; be addictive; and be subject to wide-spread abuse. 

The true fact is: (1) Marijuana's medicinimal value has been acknowledged by 36 state's including new jersey. (1983 - R-Basano-Medical Marijuana Research bill ) citizens in 7 state's -Arizona, Alaska, California, Oregon, Washington St., Nevada, Maine and the District of Columbia have legalized marijuana for medicimal use. ( Some of the same use's I use it for)- 11 other's have decriminalized it. The federal government itself distributes marijuana to individual's in the NIDA program* , as well as license's corporations to market synthetic marijuana in pill form (THC-pills) Marinol(2) Marijuana is not addictive, the governments own scientific reports confirm this, the latest being the March 1999 Institute of Medicine report appropiatedly titled "Marijuana as Medicine" - Commissioned in 1996 by Gen. Barry MCaffery, the drug Czar after he ridiculed Prop 215 and 200 in California and Arizona after they passed making marijuana legal in thos state's- I have a copy of this entire report and will submit it as evidence to dispute the State of New Jersey's claim's. (3) Abuse - In 6000 years of recorded human marijuana use not one death has been caused by marijuana. People use marijuana it is impossible to abuse it. 

Knowing not only that I could convince a jury to acquit me, my defense could severly harm the state's cash cow the marijuana laws. If I'm acquited using this (OFFENSE) defense, I will set a precedent for future victims of the marijuana laws. Maybe my case will be the Roe vs Wade case of the marijuana issue. (njweedman -vs- nj) . In hopes of raising public awareness in Camden County, [where my jury will be pooled from] to the citizen's weapon of war - JURY NULLIFICATION , I again am running for the 1st Congressional district seat against (d) Rob Andrew's. 

 "While the jury has the power to do so, (Nullify a Law) the defendant (Mr. Forchion) should not be allowed  to advertise that power to the jury" - John T. Wynne, assit state prosecutor - June 3rd, 1999 letter to Judge Freeman. -1

I attached  a packet of my newspaper stories along with my motion, to Judge Brown on May 15th. My quote's and statements from the newspaper stories, as well as my website - www.tlmp.org ( Ed Forchion's - Legalize Marijuana Party ) , according to the rights read to me by Mark Nickalous, should all be admitted as evidence. I've mentioned Jury Nullification, and my marijuana use in public statements plenty of times, - I've listed several of the reason's I freely choose to use "safe" natural marijuana over "dangerous" man-made drugs', including my religious preference to use natural herbs, for the healing of the body, mind and the soul. I know the government can't force me to use dangerous substance's, how can they stop me from using a safe substance.

The New Jersey Constitution - tells me that I have the right to present the truth and the jury has the authority to determine the law. This is exactedly what I wish to do -"tell my jury the truth about marijuana, it is not I who is lying, it is the state who based this New Law I charged with violating on these lie's". The truth is "marijuana, in it's natural form is one of the safest theruapeutically active  substance's known to mankind"
- {DEA} Administrative Judge Francis Young-2
 

NJ- Constitution Article 1 (6) -  Every person may freely speak, write and publish his sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right. No law shall be passed to restrain or abridge the liberty of speech or of the press. In all prosecutions, or indictments for libel, the truth may be given in evidence to the jury; and if it shall appear to the jury that the matter charged as libelous is true, and was published with good motives and for justifiable ends, the party shall be acquitted; and the jury shall have the right to determine the law and the fact.
 

Judge Browm set a July 7th, pre-trial motion hearing, and scheduled trial for August 28th, 2000. While I look forward to my day before a Jury in superior court, where I believe I will be seeking protection from government oppression and tryanny, in several local municipal courts, and family court I have no protection. Several times since I utilized my first amendment right to free speech, police officer's have issue's totally bogus summon's. Currently Winslow twp has a $5,000.oo bench warrant. 

In Burlington County Family court, Fat -ass Judge Bell took all visitation and custody from me for my public advocation of changing the marijuana laws. My ex- who occasionally smoked with me, and never objected to my using marijuana, went to family court as a scroned, spiteful, vindictive, woman and told a batch of lie's. I have not had one of my children (Ajanea) since Sept. 18th, 1998. I'm a good father and have always been. 

I'm a good father to my 3 other children and no-one can say truthfully otherwise. The state has punished me for publicily challengening the marijuana laws. - Does the state take away children from pro-abortion rights activist. NO - I'm no more gonna smoke a joint with my now 4 year old than a abortion rights activist is going to kill their kid. Think about that, I could be a abortion rights activist advocating killing unborn babies, with no problems, but to say I have the right to ingest natural marijuana, which has never killed anybody and is very benificial to me medically - the state of new jersey takes my kid!

My ex- said I was immoral, becasue I use marijuana. She's had at least one abortion I know of,  unless killing defenseless babies is a new moral high i think she's the immoral one. Look at her using/exploiting the court's bigotry towards free blackmen like myself to keep me from being a father to my child. That's immoral. I have the right to say what-ever I want, I lost my child for saying "Legalize Marijuana", actually for defending myself in public, for many people are arrested and fined each day in new jersey courts. I'm being punished for fighting the charges. Innocent until proven guilty doesn't exist any more. 

 "Well as with the marijuana issue in Camden County, I'm going to the Burlington County public too, even though family court is ruled by ass's, and tyrannts who think they are "god", and need not answer to a jury".  I'm running for Burlington County Freeholder on the Father's Rights Party. Really I just want the oppurunity to voice my opinion on scroned mother's who use the courts to keep fathers from being father's. And the idiot's on the bench who allow this to happen to good men all across the country. 

                                              Edward "njweedman" Forchion
                                               1st Dist Congressional Candidate
                                             Burlington Co Freeholder Candidate

P.S. - I know the truth about marijuana. Marijuana is benificial to me, and millions of other's and I inhale it instead of the dangerous man-made drug's I've been prescibed in the past. I'm for father's rights. I'm against abortion which I consider MURDER. I'm not changing my religion or my choice of medicine to please anyone, I'm free. This was supposed to be a free country. 

State of New Jersey 
-vs-
njweedman 
3569-10-98
                         May, 10th, 2000
 

Camden County 
Superior Court
Hall Of Justice
5th, Mickle Blvd
Camden NJ - 08101
 

Judge Thomas Brown

RE: Interlocatory Issue’s-To be heard May, 26th

Dear Judge Brown, 
 

   As you know I’m a defendant in a case before you. As always I must again request/motion that you the court allow me to represent myself in this case. The legal defense’s I have freely chosen to employ in my defense are being denied. A conspiracy exist, amongst the local legal profession to prevent me from utilizing my chosen legal defense’s.  If a infamous defendant like Colin Ferguson “The long Island Killer” can represent himself before a Jury at trial. Why has the Camden County Superior court repeatedly denied me “njweedman”, my right to represent myself.  I know I have this right. I am competent to speak for myself before a jury, I know the consequence’s of a conviction. I believe a jury should be able to hear my case, that the law is wrong not I ! 

"Mr. Forchion desire's to pursue motions and tactic's which I clearly indicated no attorney from my office would file or pursue" MICHEAL FREIDMANN, DEPUTY DIRECTOR Camden County Office of the Public Defender- May 20th, 1999 letter to Judge Freeman

"While the jury has the power to do so, (Nullify a Law) the defendant (Mr. Forchion) should not be allowed  to advertise that power to the jury" - John T. Wynne, assit state prosecutor - June 3rd, 1999 letter to Judge Freeman.

  As you also know a jury is empowered  not only to Judge the guilty or innocence of the defendant but to Judge the law itself. ( 1972 D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals- 473 F. 2d 1113)   I as the defendant in this case wish to present a defense consisting mainly of the fact that I beleive the law itself is wrong and not I.  I call my defense OPEN ADVOCATION of JURY NULLIFICATION. The two above quote’s are example’s, I present as proof that the Office of Public Defender and the State of New Jersey have allied themselves to prevent me the defendant from presenting my chosen  legal defense.  On Feb. 27th when I met with Mr. Kaighe for the first time he also declined to sign my Client -lawyer agreement, where I stipulated the legal defense’s I wished to employ in my defense. These were the same defense’s I presented to Micheal Freidmann deputy Directory of the Public Defender’s Office previously, and which Mr. Wynne previously argued (May 24th, 1999-before Judge Freeman) against. 
 

   I would like to inform you and the court of two municipal court (Cherry Hill - Haddon Heights) appeals before Superior Court Judge Lario, ( 10-00 , 17-00), I which I’m the defendant, the 23 issue’s I raised in these case’s - Religious, Medical, Mis-classification, unconstitutional, etc, etc., I believe are interlocutory issue’s to the case before you. 3596-10-98  - See attached. - Motions

  Judge Lario assigned Joseph H. Blum, Esq. , 413 Route 70 east, Cherry Hill -NJ  to represent me in these case’s.  These case’s aren’t before a jury so my need to present myself,  in these case’s aren’t as necessary, they are written out in my respective MOTION”S TO DIMISS which were denied by the municipal court judge’s.   The same issue’s raised in these appealed case’s before Judge Lario, are the same issue’s Mr. Freidmann of the Public Defender’s Office refused to present in my defense, and Mr. Wynne asst. Prosecutor argued against allowing me to present to a jury ( May 24, 1999) delaying my case, and directly infringing upon my right to a speedy trial. 

Judge Brown I have the right to a jury Trial. ( 7 amendment to the Constitution) I have the right to speak in my own defense. ( Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S. Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 {1975}) I have envoked the desire to utilize these rights since the day I was arrested. ( Nov. 24th, 1997) and each time I was illegally contacted by member’s of the Prosecution, or the Federal government (DEA- Nov. 98)(Mitgation factor # 12). I told them I was having a Jury Trial.  I have taken my arguement to the public with public demonstrations, and statements of my right to regulate my own body with “GOD GROWN” marijuana.  I’ve been assualted, threatened and set upon by member’s of the local and state police for voicing my opinion on marijuana’s so-called illegality. I have bogus charges  filed . All after I exercised my first amendment right’s of Freedom of Religion and Free speech. I want my day before a Jury of my peer’s as garanteed by the Bill of Rights. (see attachments) Judge Brown I’m a American Dissident not a criminal. 

  The state repeatedly attempts to bribe me out of my right to a jury Trial. 

  On Feb. 8th 2000 member’s of the Camden County prosecutor’s office created a new charge. In which you set bail at $50,000 . On Feb 22, 2000 the state initiated action in Ocean County to re-open or resurrect a 1996 charge that was previously resolved. Next court hearing in that case is May 25th, 2000 the day before your case.  The state now has three felony charges against me, and has taken my parental right’s to one of my children.  The last two case’s  were created to increase the pressure on myself to abandon my desire to utilize my Right to a Fair Jury Trial in the first case 3596-10-98 which is before you. These were politically motivated action’s to increase the state’s position. 

  New Bribery Attempt. - On May, 2 2000  John T. Wynne attempted to again bribe me into surrendering my right to a jury trial. Mr Wynne sent a message throught my brother Russell Forchion a co-defendant in this case. “That he was willing to combine all the case’s, not oppose parole/probation, and down grade the charge to a second degree felony in exchange for a guilty plea.”  The message was I would get about the same time in prison as Russell did. ( 5 months-) .  My freedom is the most valuable thing I posses. The state’s offer of my guilty testimony in exchange for my freedom I believe is a violation of ( 18 U.S.C. 201(c)(2) - “The anti-gratity provision of 201(c)(2) indicates Congress’ belief that justice is undermined by giving, offering, or promising anything of value for testimony,’. If justice is preverted when a criminal defendant seeks to buy testimony from a witness, why is it not so less preverted when the state does it.”  - SIDEBAR: - On August 12th, 1999 Mr Wynne argued before Judge Freeman to issue a court order for me and my co-defendant brother Russell not to communicate and now he initaite’s a communication (bribery Attempt) with me thru the same brother he doesn’t want me to talk too. 

   This new bribery attempt is actually quite interesting but I have to decline it. The charge’s of Nov. 24th 1997 have ruined my life. Up until then I had been smoking , using marijuana for 16 years with nothing detrimental ever occuring in my life because of marijuana. Marijuana as I plan on testify to, and presenting a case for; has alway’s enhanced my life, in the face of government anti-marijuana lie’s and laws. I had a house, several cars, a business - a future, and children I was euthusiac about raising, and putting through college. I was happy. I have none of these now. I was Safely pursuing Life, Liberty and Happiness under the positive influence’s of marijuana. Now I’m ruined. Marijuana didn’t do this, the marijuana law did, and it is done to citizens everyday .  I want my day in court before a jury. I want a fair trial your honor, I don’t want to spend the next 15 years in prison claiming I didn’t get a fair trial as Mumia Abdul Jamal has.  I am entitled to this your honor.  Please can you issue a court order to the state to stop attempting to bribe me out of my right to a fair Jury trial, and schedule a trial in the near future with me representing myself. 

Sincerely,

Edward “njweedman” Forchion

CC- John T. Wynne-Prosector, Jaime Kaigne-Lawyer assigned to help me, Lee Solomon-County Prosecutor, Courier Post-Local Paper, Philadelphia Inquirer, New York Times, Washington Post, Associated Press, ACLU- NORML - (National Organization to Reform Marijuana Laws) 
Various  Internet Media Outlet’s 

P.S.- On Nov. 24th, The state “informed me that anything I said or did could and would be used against me at trial”. In a effort to insure that this in fact did happen my supporter’s have erected a WEBSITE: titled Ed Forchion’s - The legalize Marijuna Party - www.tlmp.org - // This was previously located at www.jersey.net/~njdevil , but the company Jersey.net Inc. succumbed to police and opposition pressure and terminated the site. I am again running for Congress here in the First dist against (D)Rob Andrews again as a protest to existing marijuana laws, and for the oppurtunity to publicly make statements about marijuana I wish to include in my upcoming trial before you!

March 01, 2000    (filed March 07)
 
 

Judge Thomas Brown                              Motion: For a fair Trial 
Camden County Superior Ct.
Hall of Injustice
Camden NJ 08102
 
 

   I Edward Forchion request that you please intervene on my behalf to insure that I be given a fair trial. From the day I was initially arrested ( Nov. 24, 1997), I have insisted that that my right to a fair JURY trial be honored.  I personally believe so-called plea bargains are illegal and a act of Bribery by the state. The State of New Jersey has repeatedly attempted to bribe me into surrendering my RIGHT to a JURY trial.  My co-defendants have accepted this bribery and may be called to testify against me as pay back to the state. The defense counsel that I’ve been
shackled with so far (The Public Defender’s Office) seems more concerned with helping the State of New Jersey carry out this illegal act of Bribery than ensuring that I be given a fair JURY trial that I admittedly insist on. 

FACT: The State of New Jersey wishes to keep intact it’s Marijuana Prohibition, the Office of the Public Defender I fear has a compelling financial, and employment security reason’s to assist the State in this unconscionable
endeavor.  Several private attorney’s have declined my request for PRO-BONO assistance because of this.
 

A. My whole life your honor I’ve heard if you don’t like a law change it. “I don’t like the marijuana laws”. I feel they violate the BILL of Rights and I openly say I’m trying to change them.  I’m following “gods” instructions to do so. Luckily “GOD”  bore me to parents who insisted on making me read as a young child. My parents who are from the civil rights generation as you yourself appear to come from; taught me that the Bill of Rights applies to me as well. I insist that my rights given to me by the fact of my birth within the Jurististion of the USA be respected as well as the inalienable “god” given rights. In the proceedings so far these rights have not been respected.

  1. The very first right the Bill of Rights gives us all is the right to Religious Freedom.  While I was born to traditional black Baptist parents, Christianity never fit me. I rejected Christianity before the age of 12. Over the years I’ve called myself a agnostic, a atheists and even went through a stage in my life where I tried following the teachings of  Islam. While many of my dietary habit’s still conform to Islamic teachings I again found that Islam wasn’t for me. I have freely chosen to follow RASTAFARI.

  2.  In 1994 I met a person who introduced me to the East African Religion of RASTAFARI. - While at first, I didn’t embrace RASTAFARI as ardently as I now embrace it I never heard the voice of “JAH” before. Jah is the name of “GOD”  within RASTAFARI.  I now after accepting his word, regularly receive instructions from “GOD”.“God” has told me he is guiding me, leading me into this battle with Babylon. This trial is my destiny. Has always been my destiny and there is no changing destiny, for “god” has made it so. Whether the State of New Jersey
knows it or not “GOD” is on myside. 

     (A)- RASTAFARI -   is a US and UN recognized religion which first took root in the nineteenth century and has since gained adherents (700,000) in the United States and (14 million) worldwide. It is among the 1,558 religious groups sufficiently stable and distinctive to be identified as one of the existing religions in this country. Rastafarian’s regard marijuana as a holy sacrament. Rastafarian’s use marijuana as a natural medicine. -
-See US Vs Bauer, 75 F.3d 1366 (9th Cir. 1996), 9th Circuit Court of Appeals (March 96)
-See: U.S.Guam vs. Benny Toves Guerrero, CF0001-91, Superior Court of US Guam. (July-99). 

  (B)- For the last several years I have worked to change the marijuana/religious laws in two state’s. Arizona and New  Jersey. Because of this I’ve become a enemy of the State of New Jersey which has declared a “WAR” against it’s citizens who choose to regulate their own bodies. In violation of the ninth amendment right to regulate one’s own body. I am a prophet of “GOD” sent here to battle babylon over his gift ( Marijuana)  . The State of New Jersey calls this “WAR” a “War on drugs” when actually it’s a war on the freedoms the U.S. Constitution has empowered each and every citizen with.  My religion and it’s teachings are illegal with New Jersey.  I and my family am the victim of this “WAR”. 
 

3.  The Religious Restoration Act of 1993, The International Religious Freedom Act, and the New Jersey Religious Freedom Act of 1998 all enable defendants such as myself to claim a Religious Defense. In the last two years I have repeatedly attempted to do such and have also repeatedly been refused accommodation by the counsel shackled to my defense. First being Kevin Walshe of the Public Defender’s Office and now by Jaime Kaigh appointed by the Public Defender’s Office. 

    (A). On several occasions I expressed to Kevin Walshe and Deputy Director Michael Freidmann my desire’s to present a defense utilizing Religious Freedom. I was refused assistance as was confirmed in Michael Freidmann’s letter dated May 20th to Judge Freeman. In this letter Mr. Freidmann stated that, “he nor anyone in his office will pursue such a defense”. 

    (B). On Feb. 27th, 2000 I met with Public Defender appointee Jaime Kaigh, esq. . Mr. Kaigh while a lot more respective to my defense’s and actually proposed defense’s I hadn’t attempted to employ, “MY DEFENSE” again was declined. I believe Mr. Kaigh is still following Deputy Public Defender Michael Freidmann’s instructions and
not my wishes. 

4. I have repeatedly asked the court to allow myself to represent myself. The court continue’s to force the Office of the Public Defender to represent me when clearly the Office of the Public defender is looking to protect the State of New Jersey’s interest and not mine the defendant.  I cannot get a fair trial with the continued interference of the Office of the Public Defender. I again state I wish to represent myself, in light of the fact the public defender’s Office is not representing me in the manner and tactic’s I wish to legally employ. 

    (A). If convicted I will always claim the Public Defender’s Office was acting as a agent of the State of New Jersey in refusing to employ my desired and LEGAL defense’s. 

    (B). The State of New Jersey since my Nov. 24th, 1997 arrest has repeatedly attacked me, in a effort to silence me on telling the truth about marijuana and the jury’s power to Nullify a law.  The most recent attack Feb. 08th, 2000 .

5. Open Advocation of Jury Nullification as a defense. - Judge Brown, I’m not like most defendants I know theJury has the power to Judge not only evidence but the law itself. I know the Jury has the power to Nullify a law. I know the Jury is constitutionally empowered to render a verdict of guilty/ not guilty or if they so desire nullify the very law I’m charged with violating. I also know as the first defendant charged under this New Law I find myself in a unique position. My proposed legal motion’s, tactic’s and defense’s that the Public Defender’s Office refuse’s to present will openly encourage my jury to do just that, (Nullify the law). 

    (A). The State of New Jersey has factually and incorrectly described Marijuana as a schedule 1 drug.  The facts are it is not, the state of New Jersey refuse’s to accept the fact that marijuana is not a schedule 1 drug. The description of a schedule 1 drug specifically describes marijuana as having little or no-medical use in the US. I am a medical marijuana user, I at the time of my arrest was a citizen of Arizona where marijuana is in fact a schedule 2 drug. It is a medicine.  The State of New Jersey claims Marijuana (my sacrament) is dangerous. That is ludicrous.  I have repeatedly expressed to the Office Of the Public Defender that I wish to present these facts to the Jury. I openly wish to ask them to Nullify this flawed law. I base my justification with NJ Constitution article (1) 6. - This is one of the tactic’s I had proposed that Michael Freidmann rejected, and refused to allow. I only wish to tell the truth about marijuana.  It appears to me that his instruction’s to his Office personnel has been extended to Mr. Jaime Kaigh who was appointed by his Office.

  NJ Constitution Article (1) 6 -: Every person may freely speak, write and publish his sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right. No law shall be passed to restrain or abridge the liberty of speech or of the press. In all prosecutions , or indictments for libel, the truth may be given in evidence to the jury; and if it shall appear to the jury that the matter charged as libelous is true, and was published with good motives and for justifiable ends, the party shall be acquitted; and the jury shall have the right to determine the law and the fact. 

B. - I wish to call expert witness’s including three Doctor’s who will support my position that the state of New Jersey has mis-classified marijuana. And it is the law that is wrong not I nor anyone who knows the truth about marijuana and freely decide’s to ingest safe natural god grown marijuana into their bodies.

6. In a court hearing before Judge Rosenhag -(Nov. 98)  After insisting that I be allowed to represent myself she threatened me with incarceration in Ancora State Mental Hospital for what she called a competency evaluation. After accepting the offer of the competency evaluation it was withdrawn. I still wish to have this evaluation in light of how I know my statements of conversations with “god” will be viewed with some doubt or a may actually be veiwed as mentally defective. 

   (A) I wish to submitt myself for a mental evaluation not becasue I fear any defects but to clear this posiblity from the courts mind. 

   (B)  I wish to submitt to this evalaution in my normal state-under the positive benifits of “god” grown marijuana. 

    (C) I will also willing submitt to a evaluation utilizing man-made chemical medicine’s which I normally refuse to
accept.
 

Sincerely,
EDWARD “njweedman”  FORCHION.