“JUST A NIGGER”

Sometime soon I'm going to petition the Burlington County Superior Courts to change my name to Just A Nigger because this is how I'm treated by the Jackass Judge's on the benches, the  most egregious recent example is Judge SHIT-HEAD SWEENEY (click picture). On My petition for line 14 which asks to cite the reasons for this name change I will list all the times that New Jersey Judge's ignored my Constitutional rights because I'm JUST A NIGGER. This list is very long and each listing will correspond to a page on my site "NJWEEDMAN.COM". I would have been happy to have the name I first choose: NJWEEDMAN.COM, but twice JACK ASS JUDGES (Judge Vogelson and then Fratto) denied that name and it was upheld recently by a panel of JACKASS on the New Jersey Appellate Court! So now I will petition the Burlington County Superior Court to all me to be the name I truly am in their eyes!

"JUST A NIGGER"

 

21st Century definition of NIGGER

(1)Having second class citizenship rights, and limited protections under the U.S. Constitution because of RACE and or choice in Religions not acceptable to white society.”
(2) Old negative term used by white's to describe Africans.
(3) ("NIGGA") Positive term used by Africans to describe themselves
(4) - NJWEEDMAN'S -new name!

 

 

IN 1857 The U.S. SUPREME COURT in the landmark DREAD SCOTT VS SANDFORD, 19 U.S. 393, 407, 15 L.ED. 691, decision said, "No White man was bound to respect the RIGHTS of an African".

 

It doesn't take much to review the various incidences through my well documented experiences to know that very little has changed in the last 150 years since the DREAD SCOTT Doctrine was proclaimed with that decision, strong willed African males like myself still find we are restricted, having diminished rights, second class citizens: NIGGERS

 

Example: I have no“ freedom of speech;  nor freedom of religion" because I choose a Religion our "christian law makers, enforcers' and interpreters (Judges) don't like!

 

EXAMPLE: My August 2002 arrest


EXAMPLE 2: FIRED 2004

On March 1st, 2004 federal Judge Irenas solidified the DREAD SCOTT doctrine with his dismissal of my Federal Civil Rights lawsuit against the 4 state officials who “unconstitutionally” imprisoned me for exercising the American RIGHT(s) of Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Religion. In no way do I think Judge Irenas is a RACIST, but the result of his decision still makes me feel like a second class citizen. Infact Judge Irenas clearly understands the racist war on drugs better than most. On Dec 31st, 2002 Judge Irenas said this (IRENAS 'Favors revamping of Drug laws') .

 

While most Americans freely enjoy these RIGHTS, African Americans only enjoy them at the approval of white Government officials. As long as African Americans say things acceptable to white society they are free to speak, likewise as long as African Americans follow religions acceptable to white society they have freedom of religion. Speech and Religions, practices and beliefs that white society doesn't accept is not allowed. 50 years ago a "NIGGER -like me" would have been lynched, during slavery I'm the type of "nigger" who would have had is feet cut off or his tongue cut out. Now I'm the type of "NIGGER" who is jailed to shut me up by state officials, and prevented from expressing my views by elitist moralist individuals like Brian Roberts owner CEO of COMCAST CORP.

 

 

I myself say what I want, when I want, and refuse to accept the religion (Christianity) forced onto African Americans through the 350 year institution of slavery.

Thus I've been repeatedly punished by Government Officials who have railroaded into prison without the Right to a “fair trial”, had my child taken from me for speaking of marijuana (a sacrament in my religion), ordered not to talk about my beliefs by state officials, prevented from airing my political and religious beliefs on cable television then jailed for ignoring such a unconstitutional order and now on March 1st, 2004 having my civil rights lawsuit dismissed against the officers who had me illegally imprisoned!  

 

I spent 168 days in jail as punishment for what I say!

 

All this has happened because I speak about my faith and the beliefs I hold, which in America everyone is supposed to be legal!  My image of AMERICA THE FREE is surely different than most Americans, who never are confronted by Government Officials as I have just because I have a illegal religion. For those of you who think that is ridiculous; the fact is my faith: RASTAFARTI is as illegal here in AMERICA as Faluan Gong currently is in China or Quakerism was in colonial England.

 

Even when I tried to complain to the Federal authorities, about the abuse of government I suffered by State of New Jersey officials I was arrested by the U.S. Attorney Christopher Christie!

CHRISTOPHER CHRISTIE

THE U.S. ATTORNEY IS A HYPOCRITE"="

( August 2003 )

 

 

On March 1st, 2004 I finally realized what most people already knew about me.

“I’m not a citizen.
 I’m JUST ANOTHER NIGGER”!

 

Judge Irenas's decison to grant the State of New Jersey official's immunity from suit for throwing me in jail illegally sealed it. I now know I'm "JUST A NIGGER" when I can be thrown in Jail for 5 months and not even receive an apology or re-imburstment for my time away from my family,work and put in jail. Nothing, for this injustice! I wasn't givin one red penny because I'm "JUST A NIGGER"! I had a job, I was working but because I'm "JUST A NIGGER"

 

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Court Fight a Buzz Kill
For "Weedman"

New York Lawyer
March 10, 2004

By Jim Edwards
New Jersey Law Journal

The string of courtroom victories this year by Ed "NJ Weedman" Forchion ended last Monday when a judge ruled that he cannot recover damages for having been wrongfully imprisoned for advocating the legalization of marijuana while in the Intensive Supervision Program.

U.S. District Judge Joseph Irenas, who released Forchion from jail in January, restated last week that it was an unconstitutional infringement of the jailhouse lawyer's free speech when ISP officers arrested him. But Irenas found that the state officials had qualified immunity from suit because there was no clear prohibition on arresting those serving out drug convictions on ISP if they advocate drug law reform.

Previously this year, Forchion bested the Camden County Prosecutor's Office when the Appellate Division ruled that Forchion might be able to change his name to "NJWeedman.com."

And the U.S. Attorney's Office has quietly let drop charges that Forchion was creating a disturbance outside Newark's federal building in a pro-pot protest.

Lastly, with Forchion now a free man, his challenge against ISP for attempting to obtain his DNA is moot. However, as the state -- in theory -- still wants a sample from every convicted felon, one does not need a crystal bong to predict that the chances of Forchion re-raising the issue against the attorney general in the future are good.

Link to: The story and more from the New Jersey Law Journal's "Inadmissible" column

 

______________________________________

Even after serving 5 months in jail for producing POLITICAL AD'S, Comcast still refuses to air these ad's despite this ruling in my "false imprisonment case":

"The First Amendment exists so as to promote debate on issues of public importance. In this case, the advocacy of the legalization of marijuana is a legitimate political position in this country. The Libertarian Party, whose presidential candidate received over 380,000 votes in the 2000 election, advocates the legalization of drugs. Libertarian Party website at http://www.lp.org/issues/relegalize.html and http://www.lp.org/campaigns/pres/. Many elected public officials have called for a liberalization of the nation's drug laws. Simply put, Plaintiff's place in this debate will do nothing to harm a public that is already itself debating the current state of our nation's drug laws". FORCHION Vs BARTLETT, 240 2d F.Supp 302 @ IV(d)

Lawsuit seeks to force Comcast to air pro-pot ad

For The Atlantic City Press

CAMDEN - Robert Edward Forchion Jr. says he's fighting for the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech.

Others think the Browns Mills man just likes to smoke pot.

In either case, Forchion said he is running for the 3rd District seat in Congress representing Ocean County this fall, and he's spending a lot of time in court trying to spread his message challenging the country's drug policy.

Forchion, 39, filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court here Feb. 16 in an effort to force media giant Comcast to air his pro-marijuana message.

The latest trouble started after Comcast Field Marketing Manger Allen Murphy rejected Forchion's political commercial in a Feb. 12 letter stating that he wasn't a legally qualified candidate for office because he's not registered with the New Jersey State Election Division.

Forchion contends he is a legitimate write-in candidate who is not required to register.

The 3rd District seat in Congress is currently held by Republican James Saxton.

Forchion said he would have registered, but he's awaiting the March 26 outcome of another case in civil court in which he is seeking to have his name legally changed to NJWEEDMAN.COM.

In that case, Forchion said, prosecutors have argued that the name can be used to enhance a market position for selling the drug, which Forchion claims he hasn't done since 1997.

It's not the first time the marijuana advocate has found himself in legal trouble for promoting the illegal use of marijuana.

After serving 17 months on a conviction for conspiracy to distribute a controlled dangerous substance in excess of 20 pounds, Forchion was released on bail in April 2002.

Two months later he submitted public-service announcements opposing marijuana laws to Comcast for broadcast. That prompted his arrest for violating parole.

U.S. District Court Judge Joseph E. Irenas ordered Forchion's release five months later in an opinion stating: "The First Amendment exists so as to promote debate on issues of public importance. ... The advocacy of the legalization of marijuana is a legitimate political position in this country."

Forchion said his current trouble stems from religious fundamentalists who find his message provocative. He said the issue has little to do with drug use.

"I call myself a First Amendment activist," he says. "Everyone else calls me a marijuana activist."

Forchion also maintains that the erosion of free speech is a slippery slope for all Americans.

"If you don't have the right to free speech, you don't have the right to anything else," he said.

If his name change bid is successful later this month, Forchion says he will collect the 100 signatures required to be officially placed on the ballot.